Explore how the United States is on the verge of a significant transformation in cryptocurrency regulation. Discover the impact of the SEC, CFTC, and new stablecoin rules on the future of the crypto market.
The cryptocurrency landscape in the United States is on the verge of a significant transformation. After years of uncertainty and a fragmented regulatory approach, a potential pro-crypto "awakening" is on the horizon. This shift is not just a matter of government policy, but a reflection of the growing adoption and maturity of the digital asset market. The question is no longer whether cryptocurrencies will be regulated, but how, and with what impact on innovation and the economy.
The evolution of the crypto ecosystem has been meteoric, going from a technological curiosity to an economic force challenging traditional financial structures. This growth has forced regulators to rethink their strategies, seeking a balance between investor protection and fostering innovation. Inaction is no longer a viable option, as the growing adoption of cryptocurrencies by businesses and individuals demands a clear and defined legal framework.
But to better understand this "regulatory awakening," it is crucial to analyze the factors driving it. Pressure from institutional investors, seeking clarity in order to actively participate in the market, is a key factor. Furthermore, the need to combat money laundering and terrorist financing is forcing governments to establish clear rules for the operation of cryptocurrency companies. Finally, the growing popularity of stablecoins, and their potential impact on financial stability, has accelerated the need for specific regulation.
The SEC and CFTC's regulatory stance in 2025
La Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) are two of the main players in cryptocurrency regulation in the United States. Traditionally, these agencies have taken different approaches, leading to some confusion in the market. The SEC, under Gary Gensler, has tended to classify many cryptocurrencies as securities, implying a stricter regulatory regime. On the other hand, the CFTC has considered some cryptocurrencies, primarily Bitcoin and Ether, as commodities, which entails different oversight, focused on preventing fraud and market manipulation.
The distinction between "security" and "commodity" is critical in determining the scope of regulation. The SEC, responsible for regulating securities, requires comprehensive registration of issuances and full disclosure of information to investors. The CFTC, on the other hand, focuses on supervising derivatives markets and preventing fraud. This divergence has created uncertainty and made it difficult for cryptocurrency companies to operate in the United States.
But going forward, and for the remainder of 2025, greater clarity and coordination between these agencies is expected. Several legislative proposals in Congress seek to clearly define the boundaries of each entity's jurisdiction, in order to avoid regulatory overlap and provide a more predictable legal framework for cryptocurrency companies. It is anticipated that a more collaborative approach will allow for more effective regulation tailored to the specific characteristics of each type of digital asset.
A new agency for the crypto sector?
One possible solution to regulatory overlap is the creation of a new agency or the assignment of specific responsibilities to each entity. Some experts suggest that the SEC should focus on cryptocurrencies that more closely resemble traditional securities, while the CFTC should oversee cryptocurrencies used primarily as mediums of exchange or stores of value. This division of responsibilities could simplify the regulatory landscape and make it easier for companies to comply.
A clear example of the need for regulatory coordination is the case of Ripple (XRP). The SEC sued Ripple Labs, alleging that the sale of XRP constituted the sale of unregistered securities. This case generated significant uncertainty in the market and highlighted the need for clear rules on when a cryptocurrency should be considered a security. But its recent ruling has sent a more powerful message: US regulation is shifting to be pro-crypto, and this rule change will significantly impact the ecosystem.
New rules for stablecoins and stablecoins in the US
On the other hand, stablecoins, cryptocurrencies whose value is pegged to a stable asset like the US dollar, have gained enormous popularity as a medium of exchange and store of value in the crypto ecosystem. With a market cap now exceeding $230 billion, and two US companies controlling more than 70% of that market—Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC)—it's clear that this regulatory transformation could further boost the sector. However, their rapid growth has also raised regulatory concerns, particularly regarding the transparency of their reserves and their potential impact on financial stability.
The stability of stablecoin values is crucial for their mass adoption. If users lose confidence in a stablecoin's ability to maintain its peg to the underlying asset, massive runs could occur and destabilize the entire crypto ecosystem. Therefore, transparent reserves and robust stabilization mechanisms are essential to ensuring user trust.
In 2025, new stablecoin rules are expected to be implemented in the United States. These rules could require stablecoin issuers to be registered and subject to oversight by a regulatory agency, such as the Federal Reserve or the OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency). They could also establish stricter reserve requirements, requiring stablecoins to be 100% backed by liquid and secure assets, such as cash or Treasury bonds. These measures aim to protect investors and prevent systemic risks.
Auditing the stablecoin market
Oversight by a regulatory agency could include conducting periodic audits to verify the integrity of reserves and regulatory compliance. Additionally, stablecoin issuers could be required to disclose detailed information about their operations and the risks associated with their products. This transparency would help investors make informed decisions and assess the soundness of each stablecoin.
An example of the importance of proper stablecoin regulation is the collapse of TerraUSD (UST), an algorithmic stablecoin that lost its peg to the dollar in May 2022, wiping out billions of dollars in value with it. This event highlighted the risks inherent in stablecoins not backed by real assets and the need for rigorous regulatory oversight.
The collapse of UST demonstrated the fragility of algorithmic stablecoins, which rely on complex algorithms to maintain their peg to the dollar. The lack of tangible backing and the opacity of stabilization mechanisms contributed to the loss of confidence and eventual collapse. This event has reinforced the need for regulation that requires strong backing and full transparency for all stablecoins.
Generating more trust
In addition to reserve requirements, the new rules could address issues such as stablecoin interoperability and their use in payments. The creation of common standards could be promoted to facilitate the transfer of stablecoins between different platforms and wallets. The possibility of using stablecoins in cross-border payments could also be explored, which could reduce the costs and time of international transactions.
Stablecoin interoperability would allow users to transfer their funds between different blockchains and platforms easily and efficiently. This would encourage mass adoption of stablecoins as a means of payment and facilitate the development of new decentralized financial applications. Protocol standardization and compatibility across different wallets and platforms are key elements of achieving interoperability.
Impact on exchanges, DeFi, and cryptocurrency custodians
Furthermore, new cryptocurrency regulations will have a significant impact on exchanges, decentralized finance (DeFi), and cryptocurrency custodians. Exchanges, which serve as platforms for buying, selling, and trading cryptocurrencies, will be subject to stricter compliance requirements, such as customer identity verification (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML). This could increase exchanges' operating costs, but it could also improve investor confidence and attract a wider audience.
Compliance with KYC/AML regulations is critical to preventing the use of cryptocurrencies in illicit activities. Verifying customer identity and monitoring transactions allows exchanges to detect and report suspicious activity to authorities. Although compliance with these regulations can increase operating costs, it also improves the reputation of exchanges and attracts investors seeking secure and reliable platforms.
DeFi transformed
The DeFi sector, which seeks to replicate traditional financial services in a decentralized manner using blockchain technology, faces unique regulatory challenges. The decentralized nature of DeFi makes it difficult to identify responsible parties and enforce existing laws. However, regulators are expected to take a pragmatic approach, focusing on entry and exit points within the DeFi ecosystem, such as bridges between different blockchains and interfaces for interacting with DeFi protocols. These entry points could be required to comply with KYC/AML requirements and implement measures to prevent fraud and market manipulation.
Regulating the DeFi sector is a complex challenge due to its decentralized nature and the lack of a centralized responsible entity. However, regulators can focus on the points of contact between the DeFi world and the traditional financial world, such as decentralized exchanges (DEXs) that allow users to exchange cryptocurrencies for fiat currency. By requiring these entry points to comply with KYC/AML regulations, the risk of the DeFi sector being used for illicit activities can be mitigated.
Custody and security
Cryptocurrency custodians, which offer secure storage services for digital assets, will also be subject to increased regulatory oversight. Custodians could be required to obtain a license and meet strict security standards to protect their clients' assets. They could also be required to maintain insurance to cover potential losses due to hacks or operational errors.
The security of digital assets is a key concern for investors. Cryptocurrency custodians play a crucial role in protecting these assets, and proper regulation is essential to ensure they meet the highest security standards. Requiring licenses, implementing strict security protocols, and requiring insurance are all measures that can protect investors from potential losses.
An example of the impact of regulation on exchanges is Binance's decision to restrict access to some of its services to users from certain countries. This is due to growing regulatory pressure worldwide and the need to comply with local laws. The adoption of clear and harmonized regulations globally would facilitate the operation of exchanges and reduce market fragmentation.
Tax implications and state laws on cryptocurrencies
The tax implications of cryptocurrencies are a complex and constantly evolving topic. In the United States, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) treats cryptocurrencies as property, which means they are subject to capital gains tax. This means that any profit made from the sale or exchange of cryptocurrencies must be reported and taxed. The applicable tax rate depends on the asset's holding period and the taxpayer's income level.
The classification of cryptocurrencies as property has significant tax implications. For example, if an investor uses cryptocurrencies to purchase goods or services, they are considered to have sold the cryptocurrencies and must report any resulting capital gains. Furthermore, cryptocurrency mining is considered taxable income, and miners must report the market value of the cryptocurrencies they receive as rewards.
In 2025, greater clarity and simplification of tax rules for cryptocurrencies is expected. The IRS could publish more detailed guidelines on how to calculate capital gains and losses, how to treat forks and airdrops, and how to declare income from mining and stakingThe possibility of introducing a minimum threshold for capital gains, below which income would not need to be declared, could also be explored.
Clarifying crypto tax rules
Clarifying tax rules would facilitate investor compliance and reduce market uncertainty. For example, the tax treatment of forks and airdrops has been a topic of debate, and clear guidance from the IRS would help investors understand how to report these events. Furthermore, introducing a minimum threshold for capital gains would simplify the reporting process and reduce the administrative burden for investors.
In addition to federal laws, several states have enacted their own cryptocurrency laws. Some of these laws focus on regulating exchanges and custodians, while others address issues such as the use of cryptocurrencies in payments and the legal definition of digital assets. Wyoming, for example, has taken a proactive approach to cryptocurrencies, passing several laws that make it easier to start and operate cryptocurrency businesses in the state. Other states, such as New York and California, have taken a more cautious approach, imposing strict licensing requirements for exchanges and custodians.
Certificate
Blockchain Course
Basic levelTake this course where we explain blockchain in a clear, simple and concise way so that you have a very clear idea of what this new technology consists of.
Cutting through the "regulatory noise"
The diversity of state cryptocurrency laws creates a complex regulatory patchwork that can make it difficult for cryptocurrency businesses to operate nationwide. Some states, like Wyoming, have taken a pro-innovation approach, while others, like New York, have imposed strict requirements that may limit the sector's growth. Harmonizing state laws would facilitate trading and investing in digital assets nationwide.
An example of the complexity of state cryptocurrency laws is the question of whether cryptocurrencies should be considered money for legal purposes. Some states have adopted laws allowing the use of cryptocurrencies for the payment of taxes and other government services, while other states have not addressed this issue. Harmonizing state cryptocurrency laws would facilitate trading and investing in digital assets nationwide.
The qualification of cryptocurrencies as money has significant legal and economic implications. If a state recognizes cryptocurrencies as money, this could facilitate their use in payments and encourage mass adoption. However, it could also pose regulatory challenges related to consumer protection and anti-money laundering. Harmonizing state laws on this issue would create a clearer and more consistent legal framework for the use of cryptocurrencies across the country.
Transforming the system
In conclusion, the pro-crypto "regulatory awakening" in the United States represents an opportunity to establish a clear and predictable legal framework that fosters innovation and protects investors. Coordination between the SEC and CFTC, the implementation of new rules for stablecoins, oversight of exchanges, DeFi, and custodians, and clarification of tax implications are key elements of this process. If approached intelligently, cryptocurrency regulation could drive the sector's growth and cement the United States' position as a leader in the digital economy.
The future of cryptocurrencies in the United States depends on regulators' ability to strike a balance between protecting investors and fostering innovation. A clear and predictable legal framework that encourages competition and mass adoption could spur the sector's growth and solidify the United States' position as a leader in the digital economy. However, excessive or poorly designed regulation could stifle innovation and drive cryptocurrency companies to seek refuge in other countries.
Investing in cryptoassets is not fully regulated, may not be suitable for retail investors due to high volatility and there is a risk of losing all invested amounts.
