Yachts, apartments, and garages seized from alleged cryptocurrency scammer: the network reportedly affected more than 30.000 investors in Spain.

An investigation in Barcelona has revealed a multimillion-dollar cryptocurrency scam that affected more than 30.000 investors. Authorities are seizing the suspects' assets in an effort to recover the lost funds.

A complex judicial investigation in Barcelona has focused attention on an alleged multi-million-dollar fraud that reportedly affected more than 30.000 investors across Spain, with fraud estimated at more than three million euros. 

The striking aspect of the case lies not only in the amount involved, but also in the intricate network formed by the alleged perpetrators, who used the public image and the brilliance of football figures to raise funds from thousands of people through a project based on NFTs (non-fungible tokens). 

The ongoing investigation is not only shaking up the financial world, but has also resonated strongly in the sports and social spheres, generating alarm and controversy.

Former Sevilla FC players at the center of controversy

The origin of the case is a complaint filed before the Court of Instruction number 5 of Barcelona, ​​which points to 17 people linked to the fraudulent network. Among those named are six former footballers Famous people who played for Sevilla FC: Alejandro 'Papu' Gomez, Ivan Rakitic, Lucas Ocampos, Nico Pareja, Alberto Moreno and Javier Saviola.

Following this complaint, this court has initiated preliminary proceedings to clarify the facts and establish legal responsibility for this scheme, which allegedly used digital tools to raise funds without delivering what was promised to its investors.

Shirtum Europa: The digital platform that never saw the light of day

The company identified as the main nucleus of the alleged fraud, Shirtum Europa SLU, presented itself as a promoter of a supposed digital platform for the purchase and sale of NFTs. These NFTs were uniquely linked to the sports performances of prominent soccer players, a novel concept designed to attract sports and digital technology enthusiasts. Furthermore, this company promoted its own token, called "Shi token" or SHI, backed by blockchain technology, promising a unique experience to those who decided to join this community.

However, judicial investigations and complaints reveal that The digital platform was never created or officially registered, a crucial piece of information that calls into question the entire operation. 

Despite this, the project's promoters managed to raise approximately three million euros in cryptocurrency, thanks to thousands of interested parties who believed in the project's potential and innovation. The fundraising strategy relied on the public image of the former footballers, who acted as ambassadors and founding partners in the public eye.

According to the complaint and statements collected during the investigation, "Papu" Gómez was allegedly instrumental in bringing other players into the project, managing part of the image and promotion to attract investors. The use of these public figures and their active support was perceived as a fundamental element in lending legitimacy and solidity to a proposal that, in reality, lacked tangible backing.

Up to 11 possible crimes are being investigated

At this time, the Investigating Court number 5 of Barcelona is exploring up to eleven alleged crimes, ranging from fraud to tax fraud, maladministration, money laundering, misappropriation, market manipulation, and false advertising, among others. This variety and severity of charges reflect the multifaceted framework behind the operation, which not only affected the pockets of thousands of people but also compromised legal norms that protect citizens and the market.

This scandal represents a clear warning about the risks associated with projects that exploit digital technologies by offering attractive promises. without real supportIn this particular case, the combination of NFTs and a proprietary cryptocurrency was used to build trust and attract a mass audience, but the reality was that the digital platform was never developed or delivered, and the funds raised were called into question. 

Furthermore, the inclusion of high-profile former footballers as "ambassadors" and "founding partners" not only added a significant media component, but also amplified public and judicial attention surrounding the case. The presence of renowned figures surely influenced the decision of thousands of people to entrust their money to the case. Therefore, This case highlights the importance of being alert when celebrities endorse projects., since their image can be used to attract investors, for better or worse.

How to identify and avoid falling for this type of fraud?

The experience of this case underscores the importance of caution when dealing with financial proposals linked to emerging technologies. 

On the one hand, it is crucial Thoroughly research any project before getting involved, verifying that a real and recognized platform exists, and that it has official registrations and clear mechanisms for investor protection. The mere presence of public figures does not guarantee the legitimacy of a business, as they may act only as an image, without direct participation in its management or legal backing.

Likewise, it is essential Be wary of projects that promise high profits or quick returns Through complex and opaque concepts. If the information is scarce, confusing, or there are restrictions on confirming the actual existence of the product or service, it's advisable to stay away. 

Furthermore, it is always prudent assess whether the project is subject to oversight or regulation by official entities, since the absence of formal supervision increases the risk of losses.

So for those who are entering the digital ecosystem, the ideal is Use platforms and services with an established reputation such as Bit2Me, that have the endorsement of the community and regulatory agencies. This way, potential risks can be mitigated. 

Lastly, it is important stay informed about cases of fraud or vulnerability, as it helps create collective knowledge to avoid similar scenarios. Responsible disclosure and critical analysis of digital projects can make the difference between success and failure, especially when technological appeal is used as a lure for less legitimate intentions.

In conclusion, we must educate ourselves, verify everything, and maintain a very critical attitude. When a proposal sounds too good to be true, or lacks transparency and poses extremely high risks, it's time to sound the alarm. Only then can we protect our interests and avoid falling prey to these fraudulent networks that, sadly, play with the trust and hopes of thousands of people.