
The SEC, under Mark Uyeda, is reconsidering a rule that seeks to classify DeFi platforms as regulated exchanges, potentially easing regulatory burdens and promoting innovation in the crypto sector.
Alexander Grieve, vice president of government affairs at Paradigm, reported that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), under the direction of Mark Uyeda, has initiated a process to re-evaluate a controversial regulation that could have forced decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms to register as regulated exchanges. This move falls within a broader shift in the agency’s regulatory policy under the Trump administration, which seeks to take a more flexible approach towards digital assets.
PREPARE YOUR WALLETThe original proposal, known as Regulation ATS, sought to expand the definition of “exchange” to include DeFi protocols, which would have imposed regulatory requirements similar to those of traditional financial markets. However, this move was widely criticized by the cryptocurrency industry, which argued that such regulation would be impractical due to the decentralized nature of DeFi platforms.
Now Uyeda has ordered SEC staff to explore options for withdrawing the cryptocurrency portion of the proposal, which could mean relief for the DeFi sector and a boost for innovation in the blockchain space. This change of course reflects a shift in the SEC’s regulatory strategy, which seeks to balance necessary oversight with fostering competitiveness and technological development.
The change in SEC regulatory policy
The SEC’s decision to reconsider Regulation ATS marks a turning point in its approach to cryptocurrencies and decentralized finance. Under the Trump administration, the agency has taken a more relaxed stance compared to Gary Gensler’s tenure, which had implemented stricter policies.

Regulation ATS was originally designed to regulate alternative trading systems, but its expansion under Gensler would seek to include DeFi protocols within its scope. This would have forced decentralized exchange platforms to comply with the same requirements as traditional exchanges, such as SEC registration and financial disclosure. However, this move was seen as a barrier to innovation, as DEXs operate without a centralized entity that can meet such requirements.
BUY ETHEREUM HEREMark Uyeda has acknowledged industry criticism and said the SEC needs to re-evaluate its approach. The agency’s acting chairman is taking a change of direction that seeks to ease regulatory burdens and prevent DeFi platforms from being forced to operate underground or outside the United States, potentially harming the country’s competitiveness in the global cryptocurrency space.
Innovation and regulation of decentralized finance
Decentralized finance (DeFi) has seen exponential growth in recent years, becoming one of the most innovative sectors of the blockchain ecosystem. However, this growth has been accompanied by regulatory challenges, especially regarding the definition of DeFi platforms and their relationship with existing legal frameworks.
The SEC's original proposal raised concerns among DeFi developers, who argued that the regulation exceeded the agency's legal jurisdiction. DEXs, unlike traditional exchanges, do not have a centralized entity directing their operations, and their function is based on smart contracts (smart contracts) that operate autonomously. This makes them inherently different from traditional financial markets and therefore they do not fit into the classic definition of an “exchange.”
INVITE AND WINUyeda’s decision to reconsider Regulation ATS has therefore been welcomed by the industry, which sees in this move a recognition of the need to adapt regulatory frameworks to the unique nature of decentralized technologies. This more flexible approach could foster innovation and allow DeFi platforms to continue developing without facing insurmountable regulatory hurdles.
The community celebrates another victory for the crypto industry
The cryptocurrency industry has responded positively to the SEC's decision to re-evaluate Regulation ATS. Companies such as ConsenSys, one of the leading firms in the sector, have expressed their support for this change of course. Likewise, Paradigm has highlighted that the SEC's original proposal was not only technically unenforceable, but also violated the Administrative Procedure Act by not following the proper channels for its implementation.
Furthermore, the industry has pointed out that overly stringent regulation could have a negative effect on the adoption of emerging technologies and on the competitiveness of the United States in the global cryptocurrency market. Therefore, by taking a more relaxed approach, the SEC is sending a signal that it is willing to work with the sector to find regulatory solutions that promote innovation and protect investors.
This policy shift also coincides with a broader effort by the Trump administration to rein in the global cryptocurrency industry.
SOLANA BUYSInvesting in cryptoassets is not fully regulated, may not be suitable for retail investors due to high volatility and there is a risk of losing all invested amounts.
Main image from Bloomberg.



